17

Equilibrium Calculations

Calculating values for equilibrium constants and/or equilibrium concentrations is of practical benefit to many applications. A mathematical strategy that uses initial concentrations, changes in concentrations, and equilibrium concentrations (and goes by the acronym ICE) is useful for performing equilibrium calculations.

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

- Identify the changes in concentration or pressure that occur for chemical species in equilibrium systems
- Calculate equilibrium concentrations or pressures and equilibrium constants, using various algebraic approaches
- Explain how temperature affects the spontaneity of some proceses
- Relate standard free energy changes to equilibrium constants

Having covered the essential concepts of chemical equilibria in the preceding sections of this chapter, this final section will demonstrate the more practical aspect of using these concepts and appropriate mathematical strategies to perform various equilibrium calculations. These types of computations are essential to many areas of science and technology—for example, in the formulation and dosing of pharmaceutical products. After a drug is ingested or injected, it is typically involved in several chemical equilibria that affect its ultimate concentration in the body system of interest. Knowledge of the quantitative aspects of these equilibria is required to compute a dosage amount that will solicit the desired therapeutic effect.

Many of the useful equilibrium calculations that will be demonstrated here require terms representing changes in reactant and product concentrations. These terms are derived from the stoichiometry of the reaction, as illustrated by decomposition of ammonia:

$$2{\text{NH}}_{3}(g)\stackrel{}{\rightleftharpoons}{\text{N}}_{2}(g)+3{\text{H}}_{2}(g)$$

As shown earlier in this chapter, this equilibrium may be established within a sealed container that initially contains either NH_{3} only, or a mixture of any two of the three chemical species involved in the equilibrium. Regardless of its initial composition, a reaction mixture will show the same relationships between changes in the concentrations of the three species involved, as dictated by the reaction stoichiometry (see also the related content on expressing reaction rates in the chapter on kinetics). For example, if the nitrogen concentration increases by an amount *x*:

$$\text{\Delta}\left[{\text{N}}_{2}\right]=+x,$$

the corresponding changes in the other species concentrations are

$$\begin{array}{ccc}\hfill \text{\Delta}[{\text{H}}_{2}]& =\hfill & \text{\Delta}[{\text{N}}_{2}]\left(\frac{3\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{mol}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{H}}_{\text{2}}}{1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{mol}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{N}}_{\text{2}}}\right)=+3x\hfill \\ \\ \hfill \text{\Delta}[{\text{NH}}_{3}]& =\hfill & -\text{\Delta}[{\text{N}}_{2}]\left(\frac{2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{mol}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{NH}}_{3}}{1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{mol}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{N}}_{2}}\right)=-2x,\hfill \end{array}$$

where the negative sign indicates a decrease in concentration.

(a) $\begin{array}{cccc}{\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{2}(g)+\hfill & 2{\text{Br}}_{2}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & {\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{2}{\text{Br}}_{4}(g)\hfill \\ x\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill \end{array}$

(b) $\begin{array}{cccc}{\text{I}}_{2}(aq)+\hfill & {\text{I}}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & {\text{I}}_{3}{}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\hfill \\ \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & & x\hfill \end{array}$

(c) $\begin{array}{ccccc}{\text{C}}_{3}{\text{H}}_{8}(g)+\hfill & 5{\text{O}}_{2}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & 3{\text{CO}}_{2}(g)+\hfill & 4{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}(g)\hfill \\ x\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill \end{array}$

(b) $\begin{array}{cccc}{\text{I}}_{2}(aq)+\hfill & {\text{I}}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & {\text{I}}_{3}{}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\hfill \\ -x\hfill & -x\hfill & & x\hfill \end{array}$

(c) $\begin{array}{lllll}{\text{C}}_{3}{\text{H}}_{8}(g)+\hfill & 5{\text{O}}_{2}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & 3{\text{CO}}_{2}(g)+\hfill & 4{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}(g)\hfill \\ x\hfill & 5x\hfill & & \mathrm{-3}x\hfill & \mathrm{-4}x\hfill \end{array}$

(a) $\begin{array}{llll}2{\text{SO}}_{2}(g)+\hfill & {\text{O}}_{2}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & 2{\text{SO}}_{3}(g)\hfill \\ \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & x\hfill & & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill \end{array}$

(b) $\begin{array}{lll}{\text{C}}_{4}{\text{H}}_{8}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & 2{\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{4}(g)\hfill \\ \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & & \mathrm{-2}x\hfill \end{array}$

(c) $\begin{array}{lllll}4{\text{NH}}_{3}(g)+\hfill & 7{\text{O}}_{2}(g)\hfill & \rightleftharpoons \hfill & 4{\text{NO}}_{2}(g)+\hfill & 6{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}(g)\hfill \\ \\ \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill & \_\_\_\_\_\hfill \end{array}$

(a) 2*x*, *x*, −2*x;* (b) *x*, −2*x;* (c) 4*x*, 7*x*, −4*x*, −6*x* or −4*x*, −7*x*, 4*x*, 6*x*

The equilibrium constant for a reaction is calculated from the equilibrium concentrations (or pressures) of its reactants and products. If these concentrations are known, the calculation simply involves their substitution into the *K* expression. A slightly more challenging example is provided next, in which the reaction stoichiometry is used to derive equilibrium concentrations from the information provided. The basic strategy of this computation is helpful for many types of equilibrium computations and relies on the use of terms for the reactant and product concentrations *initially* present, for how they *change* as the reaction proceeds, and for what they are when the system reaches *equilibrium*. The acronym ICE is commonly used to refer to this mathematical approach, and the concentrations terms are usually gathered in a tabular format called an ICE table.

$${\text{I}}_{2}(aq)+{\text{I}}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\rightleftharpoons {\text{I}}_{3}{}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)$$

If a solution with the concentrations of I_{2} and I^{−} both equal to 1.000 $\times $ 10^{−3} *M* before reaction gives an equilibrium concentration of I_{2} of 6.61 $\times $ 10^{−4} *M*, what is the equilibrium constant for the reaction?

$$\begin{array}{ccc}{K}_{C}\hfill & =\hfill & [{\text{I}}_{3}{}^{\text{\u2212}}]\hfill \\ \hfill & \hfill & [{\text{I}}_{2}][{\text{I}}^{\text{\u2212}}]\hfill \end{array}$$

Provided are the initial concentrations of the reactants and the equilibrium concentration of the product. Use this information to derive terms for the equilibrium concentrations of the reactants, presenting all the information in an ICE table.

At equilibrium the concentration of I_{2} is 6.61 $\times $ 10^{−4} *M* so that

$$1.000\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-3}}-x=6.61\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}$$

$$x=1.000\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-3}}-6.61\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}$$

$$=3.39\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M$$

The ICE table may now be updated with numerical values for all its concentrations:

Finally, substitute the equilibrium concentrations into the *K* expression and solve:

$${K}_{c}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{[{\text{I}}_{3}{}^{\text{\u2212}}]}{[{\text{I}}_{2}]\left[{\text{I}}^{\text{\u2212}}\right]}$$

$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{3.39\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M}{(6.61\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M)(6.61\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M)}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=776$$

$${\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{5}\text{OH}+{\text{CH}}_{3}{\text{CO}}_{2}\text{H}\rightleftharpoons {\text{CH}}_{3}{\text{CO}}_{2}{\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{5}+{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}$$

When 1 mol each of C_{2}H_{5}OH and CH_{3}CO_{2}H are allowed to react in 1 L of the solvent dioxane, equilibrium is established when $\frac{1}{3}$ mol of each of the reactants remains. Calculate the equilibrium constant for the reaction. (Note: Water is a solute in this reaction.)

*K _{c}* = 4

When the equilibrium constant and all but one equilibrium concentration are provided, the other equilibrium concentration(s) may be calculated. A computation of this sort is illustrated in the next example exercise.

$${K}_{c}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{{\left[\text{NO}\right]}^{2}}{\left[{\text{N}}_{2}\right]\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\left[{\text{O}}_{2}\right]}$$

$${\left[\text{NO}\right]}^{2}={K}_{c}\left[{\text{N}}_{2}\right]\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\left[{\text{O}}_{2}\right]$$

$$\left[\text{NO}\right]=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{{K}_{c}\left[{\text{N}}_{2}\right]\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\left[{\text{O}}_{2}\right]}$$

$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{(4.1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}})(0.036)(0.0089)}$$

$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{1.31\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-7}}}$$

$$=3.6\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}$$

Thus [NO] is 3.6×10^{−4} mol/L at equilibrium under these conditions.

To confirm this result, it may be used along with the provided equilibrium concentrations to calculate a value for *K*:

$$\begin{array}{ccc}\hfill {K}_{c}& =\hfill & \frac{{\left[\text{NO}\right]}^{2}}{\left[{\text{N}}_{2}\right]\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\left[{\text{O}}_{2}\right]}\hfill \\ & =\hfill & \frac{{(3.6\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}})}^{2}}{(0.036)(0.0089)}\hfill \\ & =\hfill & 4.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}}\hfill \end{array}$$

This result is consistent with the provided value for *K* within nominal uncertainty, differing by just 1 in the least significant digit’s place.

1.53 mol/L

Perhaps the most challenging type of equilibrium calculation can be one in which equilibrium concentrations are derived from initial concentrations and an equilibrium constant. For these calculations, a four-step approach is typically useful:

- Identify the direction in which the reaction will proceed to reach equilibrium.
- Develop an ICE table.
- Calculate the concentration changes and, subsequently, the equilibrium concentrations.
- Confirm the calculated equilibrium concentrations.

The last two example exercises of this chapter demonstrate the application of this strategy.

- Step 1.
*Determine the direction the reaction proceeds.*The balanced equation for the decomposition of PCl

_{5}is$${\text{PCl}}_{5}(g)\rightleftharpoons {\text{PCl}}_{3}(g)+{\text{Cl}}_{2}(g)$$Because only the reactant is present initially

*Q*= 0 and the reaction will proceed to the right._{c} - Step 2.
*Develop an ICE table.* - Step 3.
*Solve for the change and the equilibrium concentrations.*Substituting the equilibrium concentrations into the equilibrium constant equation gives

$${K}_{c}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{[{\text{PCl}}_{3}][{\text{Cl}}_{2}]}{\left[{\text{PCl}}_{5}\right]}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=0.0211$$$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{(x)(x)}{(1.00-x)}$$$$0.0211=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{(x)(x)}{(1.00-x)}$$$$0.0211(1.00-x)={x}^{2}$$$${x}^{2}+0.0211x-0.0211=0$$Appendix B shows an equation of the form

*ax*^{2}+*bx*+*c*= 0 can be rearranged to solve for*x*:$$x=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-b\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\pm \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{{b}^{2}-4ac}}{2a}$$In this case,

*a*= 1,*b*= 0.0211, and*c*= −0.0211. Substituting the appropriate values for*a*,*b*, and*c*yields:$$x=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-0.0211\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\pm \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{{(0.0211)}^{2}-4(1)(\mathrm{-0.0211})}}{2(1)}$$$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-0.0211\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\pm \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\sqrt{(4.45\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-4}})+(8.44\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-2}})}}{2}$$$$=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-0.0211\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\pm \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}0.291}{2}$$The two roots of the quadratic are, therefore,

$$x=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-0.0211+0.291}{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=0.135$$and

$$x=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{-0.0211-0.291}{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{-0.156}$$For this scenario, only the positive root is physically meaningful (concentrations are either zero or positive), and so

*x*= 0.135*M*.The equilibrium concentrations are

$$\left[{\text{PCl}}_{5}\right]\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}1.00-0.135=0.87\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M$$$$\left[{\text{PCl}}_{3}\right]=x=0.135\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M$$$$\left[{\text{Cl}}_{2}\right]=x=0.135\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M$$ - Step 4.
*Confirm the calculated equilibrium concentrations.*Substitution into the expression for

*K*(to check the calculation) gives_{c}$${K}_{c}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{[{\text{PCl}}_{3}][{\text{Cl}}_{2}]}{[{\text{PCl}}_{5}]}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{(0.135)(0.135)}{0.87}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=0.021$$The equilibrium constant calculated from the equilibrium concentrations is equal to the value of

*K*given in the problem (when rounded to the proper number of significant figures)._{c}

$${\text{CH}}_{3}{\text{CO}}_{2}\text{H}+{\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{5}\text{OH}\rightleftharpoons {\text{CH}}_{3}{\text{CO}}_{2}{\text{C}}_{2}{\text{H}}_{5}+{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}$$

The equilibrium constant for this reaction with dioxane as a solvent is 4.0. What are the equilibrium concentrations for a mixture that is initially 0.15 *M* in CH_{3}CO_{2}H, 0.15 *M* in C_{2}H_{5}OH, 0.40 *M* in CH_{3}CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5}, and 0.40 *M* in H_{2}O?

[CH_{3}CO_{2}H] = 0.18 *M*, [C_{2}H_{5}OH] = 0.18 *M*, [CH_{3}CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5}] = 0.37 *M*, [H_{2}O] = 0.37 *M*

$${\text{H}}_{2}(g)+{\text{I}}_{2}(g)\rightleftharpoons 2\text{HI}(g)$$

[H_{2}] = 0.06 *M*, [I_{2}] = 1.06 *M*, [HI] = 1.88 *M*

$$\text{HCN}(aq)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\rightleftharpoons \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{H}}^{\text{+}}(aq)+{\text{CN}}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\phantom{\rule{5em}{0ex}}{K}_{c}=4.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221210}}$$

Substitute the equilibrium concentration terms into the *K _{c}* expression

$${K}_{c}=\frac{(x)(x)}{0.15-x}$$

Rearrange to the quadratic form and solve for *x*

$${x}^{2}+4.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221210}}-7.35\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221211}}=0$$

$$x=8.56\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u22126}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(\text{3 sig. figs.})=8.6\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u22126}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(\text{2 sig. figs.})$$

Thus [H^{+}] = [CN^{–}] = *x* = 8.6×10^{–6} *M* and [HCN] = 0.15 – *x* = 0.15 *M*.

Note in this case that the change in concentration is significantly less than the initial concentration (a consequence of the small *K*), and so the initial concentration experiences a negligible change:

$$\text{if}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}x\ll 0.15\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{M},\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{then}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(0.15-x)\approx 0.15$$

This approximation allows for a more expedient mathematical approach to the calculation that avoids the need to solve for the roots of a quadratic equation:

$${K}_{c}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{(x)(x)}{0.15-x}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\approx \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{{x}^{2}}{0.15}$$

$$4.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221210}}=\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{{x}^{2}}{0.15}$$

$${x}^{2}=(0.15)(4.9\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221210}})=7.4\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221211}}$$

$$x=\sqrt{7.4\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u221211}}}=8.6\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u22126}}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M$$

The value of *x* calculated is, indeed, much less than the initial concentration

$$8.6\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\mathrm{-6}}\ll 0.15$$

and so the approximation was justified. If this simplified approach were to yield a value for *x* that did *not* justify the approximation, the calculation would need to be repeated without making the approximation.

$${\text{NH}}_{3}(aq)+{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}(l)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\rightleftharpoons \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{\text{NH}}_{4}{}^{\text{+}}(aq)+{\text{OH}}^{\text{\u2212}}(aq)\phantom{\rule{5em}{0ex}}{K}_{\text{c}}=1.8\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\times \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{\text{\u22125}}$$

$[{\text{OH}}^{\text{\u2212}}]=[{\text{NH}}_{4}{}^{\text{+}}]=0.0021\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}M;$ [NH_{3}] = 0.25 *M*

Previous Citation(s)

Flowers, P., et al. (2019). Chemistry: Atoms First 2e. https://openstax.org/details/books/chemistry-atoms-first-2e (13.4)

This content is provided to you freely by BYU Open Learning Network.

Access it online or download it at https://open.byu.edu/general_college_chemistry_2/equilibrium_calculat.